Zombies are not my cup of tea.
The idea of the zombies does not, in
any way, entice me. Be it in books or movies.
My aversion for zombies was largely
caused by the unspoken supernatural onscreen competition between them
and vampires, where zombies are characterized as repulsive, while vampires are arguably portrayed as hot and
desirable. (Yes, I'm talking about Damon Salvatore for that matter)
But it was only until 2 weeks ago when
I saw two zombie-inspired films that I gave zombies a chance.
I watched Warm Bodies and World War Z
on the same day (the former on my PC on Sat morning and the latter on
cinema that afternoon) and that, I guess, was my first foray to
zombieland.
Warm Bodies and World War Z differ both in genre and style.
Warm Bodies is a romantic love story
between a zombie and a human, where the undead are slowly capable of
emotions, especially love, and may present the possibility of them
becoming human-like once again.
World War Z, on the other hand, is a heavy-themed apocalyptic horror movie that follows a former UN investigator's journey in finding a cure to a zombie-like pandemic.
 |
Nicholas Hoult (Warm Bodies) vs. Brad Pitt (World War Z) |
And because the two films' portrayal of
the undead are so different from one another, it intrigued me how
zombies are portrayed in other shows.
That's when I convinced myself to
finally give Walking Dead a slot in my evening dates with the
computer.
Almost everyone in the office raves
about how amazing The Walking Dead is (and I didn't really care cause I
already have enough fandoms to belong to). But since all of my fave TV shows like The Vampire Diaries, Nikita, Arrow aren't back until Fall, I finally
hit play button for this critically-acclaimed show.
 |
Walking Dead |
Play Season 1
At first I found it boring and dragging
compared to the fast-paced feel of The Vampire Diaries and Nikita
where so many things happen in just one episode. And, the first
episode is 1 hour long! But when you patiently sit on it and wait for
the story to unfold, it can actually hook you in the long run because it follows
the life of a group of people and the challenges they face in order
to survive in a zombie-infested community, whatever the cost.
What took me so long to watch
this are the presence of violence and gruesomeness. Okay, let's skip
the violence part since Nikita, TVD and Arrow have their fair share
of violence to brag about, but the gruesomeness – goodness! – is
something I find hard to stomach.
Ravens feeding on a dead cat, zombies
competing over the flesh of a horse, flies feasting over dead bodies
in the streets - from opening credits to the last second of the
episode – Walking Dead never fails to deliver the sporadic thrill required from a horror show.
Let's give the Walking Dead production
team enough credits for the effective use of make-up and for making
these zombies look so real and despicable on screen. This, plus the
interesting relationship of characters to one another, is what makes Walking Dead such a commercial and critical success.
Just this Saturday, I finally finished
the 6
th episode of Walking Dead (that's how long it took
me, sorry!) and I realized it was worth the try after all. Paging
Fritz Flores, give this damn thing a chance, too! :D
To suffice my growing curiosity for the
undead, I watched 28 days Later (2002) and 28 weeks later (2007) last
weekend, after reading movie reviews that compared World War Z to
the two first mentioned movies.
Yes I know, 28 Days and 28 Weeks were
so long ago and I sounded much of a loser to have not watched them
until the weekend, but this is because I was never into this type of
genre. I only got to expand my film options a few years back when I
realized I'm too old for Lindsay Lohan's and Hilary Duff's teenage
rom-coms. *facepalm*
Going back to 28 Days (Cillian Murphy and Naomie Harris)
and 28 Weeks Later (Jeremy Renner and Rose Brynes), the films focus on how the spread of epidemic has threatened the people of Britain at
the brink of extinction.
In fact, some scenes in 28 Days Later
resembled those in Walking Dead and 28 Weeks Later to World War Z.
Cillian Murphy's waking up alone at the hospital in the height of a
zombie-apocalypse was similar to Andrew Lincoln' scene in Walking Dead
Season One's 1st episode. In the same way the fast-moving
zombies in 28 Weeks Later was similar to the super duper fast-moving
zombies of World War Z. And I'm betting Pepsi was a major sponsor for
28 Days and World War Z. Agree, anyone?? :D
Hypothetical Question: if someone was bitten by a zombie, should you chop the part of the body that was
bitten just like what Brad Pitt did to the female soldier in World
War Z to preserve the person's life? Or should you kill the person
mercilessly because he runs the risk of infecting everyone like in 28
days later?
This question is not life-changing, but
go ponder on it anyway.
After the many hours I've spent lately
in front of the computer watching zombie-related stuff, here's what I
realized: the body-chopping, blood-splattering, head-shooting scenes
do not disgust me anymore.
I guess I'm ready to level up and watch
horror and slasher films now.
I have grown immune to it, but it
doesn't change a thing. Zombies are still not my cup of tea.
Labels: 28 days later movie, 28 weeks later movie, Books Movies and TV, The Walking Dead, why you should walking dead series, world war z movie, zombie-apocalypse TV shows and movies